So, this blog is public.

I have never really thought about what my posts might mean to other people when I write them.  I guess this blog serves as a space for me to reflect on the world and I’ve always thought of it as a “safe” place — no one knows about it except for the people I tell about it, or my twitter-friends who click over after it advertises itself there.

I cherish each comment, because it shows that what I’ve written speaks to someone — usually, to close friends who probably read out of pity or just an interest in keeping in touch — but each time a comment comes up I have been so excited to have a “conversation” about what I was thinking.

Today, I had my first negative comment — not negative like “you are stupid,” but worse: negative like “you should have thought about what you were saying more, because when you challenged this you attacked something that is good, that you agree with, and now you are going to fight to take those words back, and it will never be the same.”

So, as I am trying to focus on bar studying and surviving the next week, I am also seriously considering how my critiques might impact their subjects.  Specifically, I wrote a post criticizing a shallow theological expose, and the author has challenged me to suggest better ways to reach out to a community in which Christ is not a name generally respected and revered.

It is honestly hard for me to imaging such a community, and I don’t have a platform of ideas about how to minister in a community different from America.  It is harder still for me to imagine that community being won over by a shallow theological expose, but do I really have the right to criticize what I do not fully and entirely understand?

I think I do.  I think that (while I certainly never intended for my attack to be linked to his post!  I don’t think I did that — I don’t really even know how to do that) my words were justified, but out of context.  Perhaps in the author’s world, his article was great and wonderful, but in mine it falls short.  And I think that is okay — we all live in different worlds, have different circles, and approach issues differently.  We all have different needs, and while non-Christians and teenagers crave one kind of dialogue, I crave a deeper, meaningful discussion of our world, of our God, and of our purpose.

I haven’t allowed the comment to post to the blog yet, but I’m sure that I will — I want to protect this space as a safe place for my own thoughts, but I also want to create an open dialogue for real theological discussions.   I’m not quite ready yet, but in a few days when I’m thinking more rationally and not cramming for the biggest test of my life, I’ll be prepared to respond to it directly.

Until then, I feel moved by the dialogue I have had with the author — although we have only “spoken” indirectly, I have learned to carefully choose my methods of attack when posting about religion because, as much as I dislike those who throw Christianity around like chump change and who misunderstand and misinterpret what it means, I also love it, and want to nurture it.  And I hope that, from time to time, the author will think “what am I really saying here” when he posts articles to his popular blog, because I think that adding a little substance will make the difference between people knowing Christ’s name and feeling His call.

Advertisements

4 comments

  1. MJ Houston

    Honestly, I think it is cool that the author contacted you (good or bad). I made my students write an essay about an author two years ago and I was stunned when one of my students actually emailed her favorite author and he emailed her back! They had a few conversations (granted they were more interview type convos) and I just kept telling her how jealous I was that she got to talk to someone she admired so much.

    • pinkbriefcase

      It is pretty cool, MJ, you are right — I guess I just felt guilty about it when I saw that my post was linked to his. I didn’t want all of his readers to see my comments, but maybe that is okay too. I like that my words are causing myself and others serious contemplation, but next time I hope they are more positive!

  2. estherlou

    There will always be some people who are fanatical about their beliefs or likes. When you run across someone like this, no matter what you say, or how much information you might have on your side, they will not listen or believe. Religion falls into that category. We take a lot on faith, and faith is hard to prove. So each side of the coin will be unable to budge from their beliefs. It is sometimes easier to not confront someone. I recently answered someone who posted on Allah and the differences in the words for Lord. I was told I knew nothing and didn’t need to be answering his blog because I didn’t know what I was talking about. Really? I thought we were having a discussion? LOL Don’t take it personally. Just pick and choose your opinion posts.

    • pinkbriefcase

      Hi estherlou, and welcome. I want to be fanatical in a good way, I guess!

      The more I think about this, the more I think I would rather talk about it and even be wrong then to sugar-coat my thoughts and feelings. I’ll be sure to take your advice about not taking it personally, and hope that people who read and sometimes disagree will do the same!

Have something to say? Add it here:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s